Melessa
print

Links and Functions
Language Selection

Breadcrumb Navigation


Content

Publications

  • Berndt, M., Schmidt, F., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., Fischer, M., & Zottmann, J. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963
  • Brodbeck, F. C., Kugler, K. G., Fischer, J. A., Heinze, J., & Fischer, D. (2021). Group-level integrative complexity: Enhancing differentiation and integration in group decision-making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219892698
  • Furtner, N. C., Kocher, M., Martinsson, P., Matzat, D., & Wollbrant, C. (2021). Gender and cooperative preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 181, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.030
  • Guber, R., Kocher, M.G., & Winter, J. (2021). Does having insurance change individuals' self-confidence? Journal of Risk and Insurance, 88(2), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12319
  • Kapetaniou, G. E., Reinhard, M. A., Christian, P., Jobst, A., Tobler, P. N., Padberg, F., & Soutschek, A. (2021). The role of oxytocin in delay of gratification and flexibility in non-social decision making. Elife, 10, e61844. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61844
  • Knoller, C., Neuß, S., & Peter, R. (2021). How social preferences provide effort incentives in situations of financial support. PLOS ONE, 16(1), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244972
  • Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2021). Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 187, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.026
  • Schindler, D., & Westcott, M. (2021). Shocking Racial Attitudes: Black G.I.s in Europe. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(1), 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa039
  • Schmidt, K. M., & Ockenfels, A. (2021). Focusing climate negotiations on a uniform common commitment can promote cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(11). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013070118
  • Kugler, K. G., & Coleman, P. T. (2020). Get Complicated: The Effects of Complexity on Conversations over Potentially Intractable Moral Conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12192
  • Litterscheidt, R., & Streich, D. (2020). Financial education and digital asset management: What's in the black box?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 87, 101573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101573
  • Batrancea, L. et al. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191
  • Cagala, T., Glogowsky, U., Grimm, V., Rincke, J., & Tuset-Cueva, A. (2019). Rent extraction and prosocial behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 166, 709-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.008
  • Doyle, L., & Schindler, D. (2019). μCap: connecting FaceReader™ to z-Tree. Journal of the Economic Science Association 5(1), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00065-1
  • Grimm, S. (2019). Effects of choice observability on risk taking: The role of norms. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.003
  • Grimm, S., & Klimm, F. (2019). Blaming the refugees? Experimental evidence on responsibility attribution. Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.03.004
  • Klimm, F. (2019). Suspicious success – Cheating, inequality acceptance, and political preferences. European Economic Review, 117, 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.008
  • Klimm, F., & Loipersberger, F. (2019). Choice as justification for dishonesty. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 81, 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.06.006
  • Kocher, M, Lucks, K.E., & Schindler, D. (2019). Unleashing Animal Spirits: Self-Control and Overpricing in Experimental Asset Markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(6), 2149–2178. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy109
  • Martinsson, P., Persson, E. (2019). Physician behavior and conditional altruism: the effects of payment system and uncertain health benefit. Theory Decis 87, 365–387 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09714-7
  • Schwardmann P., & van der Weele J. (2019). Deception and self-deception. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7
  • Dwenger, N., & Lohse, T. (2018). Do individuals successfully cover up their lies? Evidence from a compliance experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.08.007
  • Fiederling, K., Schiller, J., & von Bieberstein, F. (2018). Can we Trust Consumers’ Survey Answers when Dealing with Insurance Fraud? Schmalenbach Business Review, 70(2), 111-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-017-0041-z
  • Hartmann, F. G. H., & Schreck, P. (2018). Rankings, Performance, and Sabotage: The Moderating Effects of Target Setting. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1244015
  • Kocher, M. G., Lahno, A. M., & Trautmann, S. T. (2018). Ambiguity aversion is not universal. European Economic Review, 101, 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.09.016
  • Kocher, M. G., Schudy, S., & Spantig, L. (2018). I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Management Science, 64(9): 3971-4470. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2800
  • Kocher, M. G., Tan, F., & Yu, J. (2018). Providing global public goods: Electoral delegation and cooperation. Economic Inquiry, 56(1), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12482
  • Kocher, M., Schindler, D., S. Trautmann T., & Xu, Y. (2018). Risk, Time Pressure, and Selection Effects. Experimental Economics, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-018-9576-1
  • Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000135
  • Kuhn, T., Solaz, H., & van Elsas, E. J. (2018). Practising what you preach: how cosmopolitanism promotes willingness to redistribute across the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1759-1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1370005
  • Kurz, V., Orland, A., & Posadzy, K. (2018). Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination. Experimental economics, 21(3), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9540-5
  • Maier, M. A., Dechamps, M. C., & Pflitsch, M. (2018). Intentional observer effects on quantum randomness: a Bayesian analysis reveals evidence against micro-psychokinesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00379
  • Pachler, D., Kuonath, A. , Specht, J., Kennecke, S., Agthe, M., & Frey, D. (2018). Workflow Interruptions and Employee Work Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Polychronicity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 417-427. http://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000094
  • von Bieberstein, F., & Schiller, J. (2018). Contract design and insurance fraud: an experimental investigation. Review of Managerial Science, 12(3), 711-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0228-1
  • Aydogan, G., Jobst, A., D'Ardenne, K., Müller, N., & Kocher, M. G. (2017). The Detrimental Effects of Oxytocin-Induced Conformity on Dishonesty in Competition. Psychological Science, 28(6), 751-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617695100
  • Herbst, L., Konrad, K. A., & Morath, F. (2017). Balance of power and the propensity of conflict. Games and Economic Behavior, 103, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.12.013
  • Herbst, L., Morath, F., & Konrad, K.A. (2017). Balance of power and the propensity of conflict. Games and Economic Behavior, 103, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.12.013
  • Jaspersen, J., & Aseervatham, V. (2017). The Influence of Affect on Heuristic Thinking in Insurance Demand. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(1), 239-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12088
  • Kocher, M. G., Martinsson, P., Myrseth, K. O. R., & Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Strong, bold, and kind: Self-control and cooperation in social dilemmas. Experimental Economics, 20(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9475-7
  • Kocher, M. G., Poulsen, O., & Zizzo, D. J. (2017). Social preferences, accountability, and wage bargaining. Social Choice and Welfare, 48(3), 659-678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1028-x
  • Konrad, K. A., Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2017). Compliance with endogenous audit probabilities. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(3), 821-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12182
  • Krämer, F., Schmidt, K. M., Spann, M., & Stich, L. (2017). Buyer and seller data from pay what you want and name your own price laboratory markets. Data in brief, 12, 513-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.049
  • Krämer, F., Schmidt, K. M., Spann, M., & Stich, L. (2017). Delegating pricing power to customers: Pay what you want or name your own price?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 136, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.019
  • Krämer, F., Schmidt, K. M., Spann, M., & Stich, L. (2017). Delegating pricing power to customers: Pay what you want or name your own price?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 136, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.019
  • Lindner, F., & Rose, J. (2017). No need for more time: Intertemporal allocation decisions under time pressure. Journal of Economic Psychology, 60, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.004
  • Ludwig, S., Fellner-Röhling, G., & Thoma, C. (2017). Do Women Have More Shame than Men? An Experiment on Self-Assessment and the Shame of Overestimating Oneself. European Economic Review, 92, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.11.007
  • Malmendier, U., & Schmidt, K. M. (2017). You owe me. American Economic Review, 107(2), 493-526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140890
  • Schmidt, K. M., Fey, L., & Thoma, C. (2017). Competition and incentives. European Economic Review, 98, 111-125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.012
  • Schumacher, H., Kesternich, I., Kosfeld, M., & Winter, J. (2017). One, two, many—Insensitivity to group size in games with concentrated benefits and dispersed costs. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(3), 1346-1377. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdw043
  • Baillon, A., Koellinger, P. D., & Treffers, T. (2016). Sadder but wiser: The effects of affective states and weather on ambiguity attitudes. Journal of Economic Psychology, (53), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.008
  • Clemons, E. K., Wilson, J., Matt, C., Hess, T., Ren, F., Jin, F., & Koh, N. S. (2016). Global differences in online shopping behavior: Understanding factors leading to trust. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 1117-1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1267531
  • Englmaier, F., & Gebhardt, G. (2016). Social dilemmas in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.006
  • Knoller, C. (2016). Multiple reference points and the demand for principal‐protected life annuities: An experimental analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12101
  • Kocher, M., & Matzat, D. (2016). Preferences over punishment and reward mechanisms in social dilemmas. Journal of Institutional & Theoretical Economics, 172(1), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245616X14500948554072
  • Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2016). Dubious versus trustworthy faces: what difference does it make for tax compliance?. Applied Economics Letters, 23(6), 394-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1076150
  • Thoma, C. (2016). Under-versus overconfidence: an experiment on how others perceive a biased self-assessment. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9435-2
  • Aseervatham, V., Jaspersen, J.G., & Richter, A. (2015). The Affection Effect in an Incentive Compatible Insurance Demand Experiment. Economics Letters, 131, 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.03.029
  • Bartling, B., & Schmidt, K. M. (2015). Reference points, social norms, and fairness in contract renegotiations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(1), 98-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12109
  • Herbst, L., Konrad, K. A., & Morath, F. (2015). Endogenous group formation in experimental contests. European Economic Review, 74, 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.12.001
  • Ke, C., Konrad, K. A., & Morath, F. (2015). Alliances in the shadow of conflict. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12151
  • Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2015). An experimental test of precautionary bidding. European Economic Review, 78, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.04.009
  • Kocher, M., Martinsson, P., Matzat, D., & Wollbrant, C. (2015). The role of beliefs, trust, and risk in contributions to a public good. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.001
  • Koellinger, P., & Treffers, T. (2015). Joy leads to overconfidence, and a simple countermeasure. PLOS ONE, 10(12), e0143263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143263
  • Pahlke, J., Strasser, S., & Vieider F.M. (2015). Responsibility Effects in Decision Making under Risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-015-9223-6
  • Schöning, N., Thurner, P. W., & Binder, M. (2015). Indifferenz und Inkonsistenz als Moderatoren von Framing-Effekten: Ein Experiment am Beispiel der Kernenergie. In Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie (127-158). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07583-5_5
  • Schreck, P. (2015). Honesty in managerial reporting: How competition affects the benefits and costs of lying. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.01.001
  • Englmaier, F., Strasser, S., & Winter, J. (2014). Worker characteristics and wage differentials: Evidence from a gift-exchange experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.013
  • Konrad, K. A., Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2014). Deception choice and self-selection–The importance of being earnest. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.07.012
  • Konrad, K. A., Morath, F., & Müller, W. (2014). Taxation and market power. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 47(1), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12067
  • Lahno, A.M., & Serra-Garcia, M. (2014). Peer Effects in Risk Taking. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-015-9209-4
  • Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2014). Gender differences in deception behaviour–the role of the counterpart. Applied Economics Letters, 21(10), 702-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.848020
  • Schiffels, S., Fügener, A., Kolisch, R., & Brunner, O. J. (2014). On the assessment of costs in a newsvendor environment: Insights from an experimental study. Omega, 43, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.05.002
  • Schikora, J. (2014). How do groups stabilize corruption. Journal of International Development 26(7), 1071-1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2902
  • Schmidt, K. M., Spann, M., & Zeithammer, R. (2014). Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Science, 61(6), 1217-1236. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1946
  • Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (2013). Use and Abuse of Authority-A Behavioral Foundation of the Employment Relation. JEEA, 11(4):711-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12017
  • Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2013). Discretion, productivity, and work satisfaction. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 169(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245613X660357
  • Brodbeck, F. C., Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. M., & Maier, M. A. (2013). Morals Matter in Economic Games. PLOS ONE, 8, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081558
  • Efferson, C., & Vogt, S. (2013). Viewing men’s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness. Scientific Reports, 3, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01047
  • Gneezy, U., Rockenbach, B., & Serra-Garcia, M. (2013). Measuring lying aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.025
  • Ke, C., Konrad, K.A., & Morath, F. (2013). Brothers in Arms - An Experiment on the Alliance Puzzle. Games and Economic Behavior, 77, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.08.011
  • Sandroni, A., Ludwig, S., & Kircher, P. (2013). On the difference between social and private goods. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 13(1), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2012-0008
  • Serra-Garcia, M., Van Damme, E., & Potters, J. (2013). Lying about what you know or about what you do?. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5), 1204-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12034
  • Vetter, S. (2013). Delegating decision rights for anticipated rewards as an alternative to corruption: An experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 31, 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.06.001
  • Aydin, N., Krueger, J., Fischer, J., Hahn, D., Frey, D., Kastenmüller, A., & Fischer, P. (2012). A man`s best friend: How the presence of a dog decreases mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 446-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.011
  • Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2012). Screening, competition, and job design: Economic origins of good jobs. American Economic Review, 102(2), 834-64 http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.834
  • Houser, D., Vetter, S., & Winter, J. (2012). Fairness and cheating. European Economic Review, 56(8), 1645-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.08.001
  • Pahlke, J., Strasser, S. & Vieider, F. M. (2012). Risk-taking for others under accountability. Economics Letters, 114(1), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.09.037
  • Vieider, F. M. (2012). Moderate stake variations for risk and uncertainty, gains and losses: methodological implications for comparative studies. Economics Letters, 117(3), 718-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.028
  • Fiedler, M., Haruvy, E., & Li, S. X. (2011). Social distance in a virtual world experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(2), 400-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004
  • Faulmüller, N., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 653-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210369143
  • Lammers, F., & Schiller J. (2010). Einflussfaktoren für betrügerisches Verhalten von Versicherungsnehmern: erste experimentelle Befunde. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswirtschaft, 99, 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-010-0097-z
  • Fiedler, M., & Haruvy E. (2009). The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field - An experimental investigation of trust games with communication. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(2) , 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.07.013